Legal Opinion

Wicks v. Langford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1959No. 3420PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.. Nathan Langford and others, as trustees for the A.M.E. Church of Big Spring, sued James Manning, Lena Wicks, Elnora Dos-sie Johnson and husband, Willie Johnson, for title and possession of Lot Number One in Block F of the Moore Addition to Big Spring. Plaintiffs’ petition consisted of three counts, the first was in trespass to try title; the second alleged a contract between the plaintiffs and James Manning and Lena Manning Wicks for the exchange of a lot owned by said church for all of Lot One and that the conveyance by James Manning and Lena Manning Wicks to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adams v. DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. West Production Co. v. KahanekTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Richards v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. W. T. Carter & Brother v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Humphreys v. GribbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Kleckner v. McClureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. O. K. C. Corp. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Petty v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Miller v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API