Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Office Max, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 17, 2013No. 2110861 and 2110862Published

1ConcurrenceThompson, Presiding Judge

I concur in the result insofar as the main opinion reverses the summary judgment in favor of Academy, Ltd. I also concur in the result insofar as the main opinion reverses the order compelling Office Max, Inc., to provide future medical benefits to Sandra Richey (“the employee”). See, e.g., Alpine Assoc. Indus. Servs., Inc. v. Smitherman, 897 So.2d 391 (Ala.Civ.App.2004) (reversal of a partial summary judgment where genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the employee’s back pain following his work injury represented a recurrence of his previous injury, in which case the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. ALPINE ASSOCIATE INDUS. SERV. v. SmithermanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  2. Office Max, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API