Legal Opinion

Office Max, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 13, 2012No. 2100658 and 2100659PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

Office Max, Inc. (“Office Max”), the former employer of Sandra Richey (“the employee”), seeks review in these consolidated appeals of two orders entered by the Etowah Circuit Court in a single civil action that, in effect, determined that Office Max is solely responsible for providing benefits to the employee under the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq. (“the Act”), and directing Office Max to provide particular medical treatment to the employee. Because we lack appellate jurisdiction as to either appeal, we dismiss both appeals.

The employee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ShowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. State v. LawhornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Ex Parte VanceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. SteppCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Ex Parte Cowabunga, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Imperial Aluminum-Scottsboro, LLC v. TaylorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  2. Office Max, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  3. Office Max, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API