Legal Opinion

ALPINE ASSOCIATE INDUS. SERV. v. Smitherman

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 1, 2004No. 2030134PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises from a dispute concerning which of two employers is responsible, under the Workers' Compensation Act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975 ("the Act"), for providing medical treatment to a particular employee.

Roger Smitherman ("the employee") filed a complaint in the Chilton Circuit Court seeking benefits under the Act arising from an alleged work-related injury to his right hip, right arm, and face that, the employee claimed, had occurred in 1999. In 2002, the employee amended his complaint on two occasions, once to properly name the defendant, Alpine Associate Industrial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moore v. Prudential Residential ServicesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Sessions v. NonnenmannSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Hipps v. Lauderdale County Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Camp v. YeagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Ex Parte Pike County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Giles v. Brookwood Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Belcher-Robinson Foundry, LLC v. NarrCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. Kanellis v. Pacific Indem. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Equipment Sales Corp. v. GwinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Mountain Lakes District v. Oak Grove Methodist Church ex rel. GreenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API