Legal Opinion

Shuman v. Bernie's Drug Concessions

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1963No. Appeal, 325PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Cohen,

Appellants, five retail drug store owners, filed a complaint in equity against appellee, Bernie’s Cut Rate Store, praying for an injunction to restrain appellee from selling drug and cosmetic products below the minimum retail prices established by manufacturers in accordance with the provisions of the Pennsylvania Fair Trade Act, as amended.

All the merchants involved in this controversy do business in the same competitive trade area. When appellee opened his cut rate store and began underselling appellants, the latter decided to take some corrective action. After…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Binder v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Lynch v. Owen J. Roberts School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Misitis v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API