Legal Opinion

Cook Inletkeeper v. Raimondo

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided May 27, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00238Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA COOK INLETKEEPER and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:19-cv-00238-SLG GINA RAIMONDO, Secretary of Commerce, et al., Defendants, and HILCORP ALASKA, LLC, et al., Intervenor-Defendants. ORDER ON REMEDY On March 30, 2021, the Court entered an order holding that the Incidental Take Regulations (“ITR”), Biological Opinion (“BiOp”), and Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact (“EA/FONSI”) relating to Hilcorp Alaska, LLC’s oil and gas activities in Cook Inlet over a period of five years…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API