Anchorage Sand & Gravel Co. v. Wooldridge
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
In this case we are called upon to determine whether a claim of lien has been adequately “verified by the oath of the claimant or another person having knowledge of the facts,” as required by AS 34.35.070(c). 1 We have concluded that the claim of lien is valid and therefore reverse the ruling below.
The appeal is from a partial summary judgment, certified as final pursuant to Civil Rule 54(b), against a corporate lien claimant, the Anchorage Sand and Gravel Co., Inc. (ASG). The claim of lien set forth a statement signed by Buff V. Jacobsen alleging the facts giving rise…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Petition for Removal of RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Greenwald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Knix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
- Gargan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- People v. RamosMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- DeNardo v. MaassenAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.