Legal Opinion

Knix v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided August 2, 1996No. A-5621, A-5634PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

Codefendants Clint D. and Connie J. Knix appeal their convictions of perjury, AS 11.56.200(a), engaging in a scheme to defraud, AS 11.46.600(a)(2), and second-degree theft, AS 11.46.180(a) and AS 11.16.110(2)(B), raising various constitutional claims and statutory construction questions. We affirm the perjury and scheme to defraud convictions but hold that the theft convictions merge with the convictions for scheme to defraud.

Clint and Connie Knix applied for and received public assistance from the State of Alaska, Division of Public Assistance (DPA), from October…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A "l.v. Hong"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Whitton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Marks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. United States v. Robert L. Beecroft, Arthur T. Harrison, James F. Hennig, and Delbert L. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Central Bering Sea Fishermen's Ass'n v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Erick Virgil Hall v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Mute v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  4. Hurd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  5. Tall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API