Legal Opinion

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 2004No. D042801PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, Acting P. J.

In this appeal, defendant and cross-complainant City of San Diego (the city) challenges a judgment that (1) upheld Proposition E, a ballot initiative that the voters in the city approved in the March 2002 general municipal election (the election) by a majority vote; and (2) invalidated as unconstitutional a key provision (discussed, post) of a second ballot measure, Proposition F, that the voters also approved by a slimmer majority vote margin in the same election.

Proposition E (titled “The San Diego Taxpayer Protection Act of 2000 Proposition 218”) which plaintiffs…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Boling v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. League of Education Voters v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. League of Educ. Voters v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Lejins v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API