Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1899No. 218PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Dunlap was, and had been for’ many years, “ engaged in the manufacture of a product of the arts known and described as ‘ stiff hats,’ ” in Brooklyn, New York. Between August 28, 1894, and April 24, 1895, he used 7060.95. proof gallons of dom'estic alcohol to dissolve the shellac required to stiffen hats made at his factory.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Dunlap was, and had been for’ many years, “ engaged in the manufacture of a product of the arts known and described as ‘ stiff hats,’ ” in Brooklyn, New York. Between August 28, 1894, and April 24, 1895, he used 7060.95. proof gallons of dom'estic alcohol to dissolve the shellac required to stiffen hats made at his factory. An internal revenue tax of ninety oents per proof gallon had been paid upon 2604.17 gallons before August 28, 1894, making $2344.40, and a tax of one dollar and ten cents per proof gallon [md been paid upon the remaining 4456.78 gallons…

1Opinion of the Court

Mb. Chief Justice Fullee,

after stating the ease, delivered' the opinion of the court.

Section 61 of the act of August 28, 189.4, reads as follows:

“Any manufacturer finding it necessary to use alcohol in the arts, or in any medicinal or other like compound, may use the same under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, and on satisfying the collector of internal revenue for the district wherein he resides or carries on business that he has complied with such regulations arid has used such alcohol therein, and exhibiting and delivering up the stamps which show that a tax…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. United States v. VerdierSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. United States v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Woollcott v. . ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. United States v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1916
  5. Five Per Cent. Discount CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API