Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chatfield v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1939No. 27130. En BancPublished

1DissentMillard, J.

(dissenting) — The trial to the court of three causes of action (which have been consolidated) brought by a number of employees of the park department of the city of Seattle to require the city to pay to them certain amounts of their respective salaries, which they alleged were unlawfully withheld from them, and to recover for time lost by reason of lay-offs, resulted in findings and judgments in favor of the plaintiffs. The city and its comptroller appealed.

The facts are summarized as follows:

The city council of the city of Seattle duly passed ordinance No. 61,908, which fixed the salaries,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bither v. PackardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  2. State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Eureka Bank v. BaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Scheller v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Aldrich v. SteenNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API