Legal Opinion

Yuba County Water Agency v. Ingersoll

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1975No. Civ. 14235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARAS, J.

Appellants E. R. Ingersoll and his wife appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for the County of Yuba entered July 6, 1973, condemning an easement under and across their property for respondent Yuba County Water Agency for the purpose of constructing the Colgate Tunnel (a part of the Yuba River Project). On appeal, they do not contest the award of $100 compensation for the easement; rather they assert that the court erred in not awarding additional compensation for the value of material excavated from the tunnel and used by the respondent in the construction of the Yuba…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. WhitehurstCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. City of Oakland v. SchenckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. HuffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. People v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Viliski v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Agency v. TobrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Redevelopment Agency v. TobrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API