Legal Opinion

Geary v. Blomerth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 26, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiffs, members of a stock brokerage firm, seek to recover of the defendant a sum of money, alleged to be due them for certain shares of stock purchased by them for the account of the defendant. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, and the case now comes before us on the defendant’s exceptions to the admission of certain evidence, to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict, to the refusal of the judge to give certain requests for instructions to the jury, and to certain portions of the judge’s charge.

The evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Squires v. FraskaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. O'Connor v. Benson Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Locke v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Proctor v. NorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lane v. EpinardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Macklin v. MacklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Boston Note Brokerage Co. v. Pilgrim Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Herron Northwest, Inc. v. DanskinWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Mass v. GordonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API