Legal Opinion

In Re Hawaiian & Guamanian Cabotage Antitrust Litigation

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 30, 2010No. 08-md-1972 TSZPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER NO. 6: Dismissal With Prejudice

THOMAS S. ZILLY, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on defendants’ joint motion, docket no. 125, and defendant Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.’s separate motion, docket no. 124, to dismiss the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint, docket no. 119 (the “Amended Complaint”), pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Having reviewed all papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, 1 the Court now enters the following Order.

Background

Plaintiffs initially made the assertions of anticompetitive activities now at issue in separate cases…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Robert S. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. In Re Southeastern Milk Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
  3. Gerald Carlin v. Dairyamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. In re Transpacific Passenger Air Transportation Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Gerald Carlin v. Dairyamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API