Legal Opinion

City of Boston v. Deputy Director

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 8, 2003No. 01-P-1829PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfer, J.

Drew Smith, a Boston police officer, was discharged for a second breach of Boston police department rules prohibiting the ingestion of controlled substances.2 He was granted unemployment benefits pursuant to a decision of the board of review of the Division of Employment and Training *226(DET) that denied the Boston police department’s appeal of the review examiner’s decision in favor of Smith. The city appeals the affirmance of that decision by a judge of the Boston Municipal Court, claiming that Smith’s discharge was, in the words of G. L. c. 151A, § 25(e), “attributable to deliberate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Garfield v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Guiney v. Police Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Still v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Attorney General v. McHattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Goldstein v. Board of Registration of ChiropractorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen of Michigan, Inc. v. Deputy Director of the Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Gupta v. Deputy Director of Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. City of Boston v. DowningMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API