Legal Opinion

DeLoach v. Alfred

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 17, 1998No. 2 CA-SA 97-0071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Petitioners Kevin and Yvonne De-Loach, defendants in the underlying tort action that arose out of an automobile accident in Tennessee, seek special action review of the respondent trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. The motion was based on the running of Tennessee’s one-year statute of limitations. We have accepted jurisdiction of the special action because it raises only an issue of law, the issue is of statewide importance, and our resolution of the issue ends the litigation. Sanchez v. Coxon, 175 Ariz. 93, 854 P.2d 126 (1993).

Real party in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. MacNeil v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Bryant v. SilvermanArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Banks v. International Rental & Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  2. DeLoach v. AlfredArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Collins v. Kohlberg & Co. (In Re Southwest Supermarkets, L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API