Legal Opinion

Gile v. Stegner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1904No. Nos. 13,894—(165)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendants', constituting the board of county commissioners of Lincoln county, from an order of the district court for said county, Webber, J., denying a motion to dissolve a temporary writ of injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

START, C. J,

This action was brought to perpetually enjoin the defendants from taking any official action upon a petition on file with the county auditor praying for the removal of the county seat of the county of Lincoln from the village of Lake Benton to the village of Ivanhoe. A *430temporary injunction was issued so enjoining the defendants, and they appealed from an order denying their motion to dissolve it.

There is practically no dispute as to the facts relevant to such motion. They are substantially these: A petition for such removal, signed by more than sixty per cent, of the legal voters…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hess v. County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1870
  2. State ex rel. Streissguth v. GeibSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Gossard v. VaughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. McKinney v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  5. Tucker v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Kaufer v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. School District No. 94 v. KingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Jurries v. VirgensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API