Louisville N. R. Co. v. Cunningham Hardware Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The suit is in damages for injury to a truck from collision with a locomotive or tender of defendant at a grade crossing of a public street in the city of Mobile. The decision on former appeal appears in Cunningham Hardware Co. v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 209 Ala. 327, 96 So. 358.
Count B lays the accident to the negligence of the watchman or flagman of defendant, one Reil, who was stationed at the crossing for the purpose of giving warning of the approach of engines and ears of defendant, and who was then and there acting within the line and scope of his employment. Tha demurrer takes the point…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. BaylissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Cunningham Hardware Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Old Southern Life Ins. Co. v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. PeinhardtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Crescent Amusement Company v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.