Legal Opinion
Toft v. Ketchum
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 2, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
18 N.J. 280 (1955)
113 A.2d 671
HOWARD LIONEL TOFT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MARY G. KETCHUM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 7, 1955.
Decided May 2, 1955.
Mr. Martin Kimmel argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. J. Chester Massinger, attorney).
Mr. Oliver R. Kovacs argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Clausen, Klein & Kovacs, attorneys; Mr. Walter Waverczak, of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered by VANDERBILT, C.J.
This appeal involves a determination as to whether the defendant may be liable to the plaintiff, an attorney-at-law, for malicious…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Melvin v. PenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Toft v. KetchumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- In Re CarlsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Toft v. KetchumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955