Legal Opinion

Toft v. Ketchum

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1955PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Vanderbilt heretofore filed. Mr. Justice Jacobs votes to affirm for the reasons expressed in his concurring opinion previously filed. Mr. Justice Waehenfeld and Mr. Justice Burling vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in their respective dissenting opinions previously filed. See 18 N. J. 280 (1955).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Jacobs and Brennan — 5. For reversal — Justices Wacheneeld and Burling — 2.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. Nitroform Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Toft v. KetchumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Devlin v. GreinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Alswang v. ClaybonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Matter of EvingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API