Legal Opinion
In Re the United States for an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register & a Trap & Trace Device
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 24, 2005No. M 05-1093(JO)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The United States seeks reconsideration of my earlier order in this matter, reported at In Matter of Application of the U.S. for an Order (1) Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register and Trap and Trace Device, 384 F.Supp.2d 562 (E.D.N.Y.2005) (the “August Order”), denying its application for the “disclosure of the location of cell site/sector (physical address) at call origination (for outbound calling), call termination (for incoming calls), and, if reasonably available, during the progress of a call, for the Subject Telephone.”…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robert J. McCarthy v. John Manson, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless TelephoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- In Re the United States for Orders Pursuant to Title 18District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- In Re the United States for an Order for Prospective Cell Site Location Information on a Certain Cellular TelephoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.