Disciplinary Counsel v. Papcke

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 161.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PAPCKE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Papcke,

2000-Ohio-291.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Remainder of existing six-month, nonstayed suspension from previous disciplinary case to be served, then followed by indefinite suspension–Engaging in a course of conduct involving several clients over a significant period of time in which forged signatures of those clients were notarized. (No. 99-1888—Submitted December 15, 1999—Decided February 23, 2000.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board…