Legal Opinion
Deal v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1926No. 4631PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCAMANT, Circuit Judge.
It is contended that the complaint on which the case was tried fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It is alleged that the defendant Deal was postmaster at Fairbanks at the time in question; that the defendants executed to plaintiff a bond in the sum of $26,-000, conditioned that the defendant Deal “should faithful-, ly discharge all the faiths and trusts imposed on him as such postmaster either by laws or the regulations of the Post Office Department of the United States”; that on the 15th of September, 1921, the First National Bank of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chaperon v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Kirby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Kohlhagen v. CardwellOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- United States v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gleckman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Haid v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Gillam v. A. Shyman, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1962
- Roden v. Empire Printing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1955
- Humphries v. StarnsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.