Popovics v. Popovics
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mint (ten, J.
On the 24th day of March, 1922, the defendant, husband, upon a petition for maintenance, Bled by his wife, the petitioner, was adjudged by a decree of the court of chancery to have “abandoned and separated himself from her without any justifiable cause,” and that he “refused and neglected to provide for her.” With that adjudication, fixing the status of the parties, the wife, on December 24th, 1923, filed her petition in this cause for divorce from the defendant upon the ground of his desertion. Upon the hearing, the learned vice-…
2Cited by8 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Pierson v. PiersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- McKee v. McKeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Holst v. HolstNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.