Legal Opinion
Sargent v. Tenaska, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 14, 1996No. Civil Action No. 94-30014-MAPPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM REGARDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
(Docket Nos. 29, 34 & 53)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff filed his original four-count complaint on January 19, 1994. Count I alleges breach of contract, Count II specific performance, Count III common law fraud and Count IV a violation of the Massachusetts consumer protection statute, Mass.Gen.L. ch. 93A. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship.
Plaintiff has filed a motion for partial summary judgment on Count I and a motion to strike. Defendant has moved for partial summary judgment on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cochran v. Quest Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Sargent v. Tenaska, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Dynamic Machine Works, Inc. v. Machine & Electrical Consultants, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Mart v. Forest River, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- 20 Atlantic Avenue Corp. v. Allied Waste Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.