Legal Opinion
Mart v. Forest River, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided February 22, 2012No. 3:10 CV 118PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge.
Defendants Forest River and Peter Liegl (“the FR defendants”) have moved to dismiss several of plaintiffs claims under Fed. R. Crv. P. 12(b)(6) (DE # 27) and Fed. R. Crv. P. 12(b)(1) (DE # 29). Defendant Berkshire Hathaway (“Berkshire”) has also moved to dismiss plaintiffs claims against it under Fed. R. Crv. P. 12(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (DE #32.) In his amended complaint, plaintiff brought six claims in total. (DE # 5 at 15-21.) Count One is a breach of contract claim against Forest River. (Id. at 15-16.)…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Brooks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Daly v. Citigroup Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- John Guerra, Jr. v. Consolidated Rail CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Verble v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Moore v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- COSTELLO v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE FLAVIUS J. WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.