Legal Opinion
Marcello v. Maine
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 19, 2006No. CV-06-68-B-WPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’MOTION FOR COSTS OF SERVICE
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
On August 16, 2006, the Plaintiffs, James and Olivia Marcello, moved to collect the costs of service of the Complaint against Defendants Farrell, Rosenblatt & Russell (FRR), William Anderson, and Travis Gould. Pls. ’ Pro Se Mot. to Collect Costs of Service (Docket #21) (Pis.’ Mot). The Plaintiffs seek not only $177.57 for the cost of service of process, but also attorney’s fees of $548.00, based their “customary hourly rate for work such as work done in this matter” in the amount of $100.00. See Pis.’ Mot., Ajf. of James…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aurelio Echevarria-Gonzalez v. Antonio Gonzalez-Chapel, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Caisse v. DuboisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Edward Krecioch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Jack Massengale v. Michael RayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Benderoff v. JohansenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Bright v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024
- CONNOLLY v. DORRISDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- FINK v. BISHOPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- Ilaw v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.