Legal Opinion

Rafftery v. Kirkpatrick

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1938No. Civ. 2177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of C. L. Cunningham to vacate an order directing the issuance of a writ of assistance and to recall the writ.

On April 6, 1931, Helen Louise Kirkpatrick and her husband were the record owners of four lots in Perris, in Riverside County, which is the property involved in this action. On that day, together with her husband, Leonard Kirkpatrick, she executed a mortgage on this property to secure a prom issory note for $750 payable to Kate Rafftery, due one year after date, with interest at eight per cent per annum. The note was not paid when due.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Kirsch v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. HarwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hentig v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Hibernia Sav. Etc. Society v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Firato v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Huber v. Danning (In Re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Severdia v. AlaimoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API