Legal Opinion

Hibernia Sav. Etc. Society v. Robinson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1907No. S.F. No. 3976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from an. order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to restrain the execution of a Writ of Assistance. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The Hibernia Savings and Loan Society commenced an action to foreclose a mortgage on several parcels of real estate in the city and county of San Francisco. Some of the defendants named in the complaint defaulted, and a decree of foreclosure was made and entered in regular form as against them. The plaintiff became the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, and, no redemption having been made within the statutory time, received the commissioner’s deed on October 30, 1902. On May 13, 1903, the plaintiff procured a writ of assistance and delivered it to the sheriff of the city and county for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Ex parte HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Enos v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rafftery v. KirkpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API