Legal Opinion

Born v. Mayers

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1994No. Civ. 930330PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

The United States District Court for the District of North Dakota certified, under Rule 47, N.D.R.App.P., the following questions of law to this court:

“I. Does the North Dakota Dram Shop Act, section 5-01-06.1 of the North Dakota Century Code, create a right of action against a party not engaged in the business of selling intoxicating liquor, who gives another an intoxicating liquor as an act of hospitality or social courtesy?
“II. Does the North Dakota Dram Shop Act, section 5-01-06.1 of the North Dakota Century Code, create a right of action against a party not engaged in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Aanenson v. BastienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Iszler v. JordaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Holmquist v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Williams v. KlemesrudSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Stewart v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Delfino v. GriffoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  4. McGee v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Douville v. Pembina County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API