Bartolini v. Andrioli
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROBINSON, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from the judgment following verdict for defendants in an action for damages growing out of a collision between two vehicles on a public highway in San Mateo County. The evidence as to negligence and contributory negligence is conflicting, but both issues went to the jury under proper instructions defining same.. Appellant claims that the court erred in making certain remarks in the examination of the witness Roy Elvin, but addressed to examining counsel in the face of interruption by opposing counsel, as follows: “The trouble is that the witness is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Hurt v. Monumental Mercury Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Murphy v. WaterhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keller v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Schultz v. SussmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Cardoza v. CardozaIdaho Supreme Court · 1955