Legal Opinion

Maynor Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Pressley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1962No. 91PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

A plea of contributory negligence must allege negligent acts or omissions on the part of the plaintiff which contributed to his injury as one of its proximate causes. Skinner v. Jernigan, 250 N.C. 657, 110 S.E. 2d 301; Adams v. Board of Education, 248 N.C. 506, 103 S.E. 2d 854; Hunt v. Wooten, 238 N.C. 42, 76 S.E. 2d 326; Holderfield v. Trucking Co., 232 N.C. 623, 61 S.E. 2d 904; Tyson v. Ford, 228 N.C. 778, 47 S.E. 2d 251.

An allegation that a party was negligent is not enough. The ultimate facts alleged must be such as to permit a reasonable inference of some negligent act or omission on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Holderfield v. Rummage Bros. Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Dinkins v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Douglas v. W. C. Mallison & SonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Warren v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Moore v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Lawson v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API