Legal Opinion

United States v. Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided July 8, 2003No. 02-0148/AFPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge GIERKE

delivered the judgment of the Court.

A general court-martial convicted the Appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of failure to obey a lawful order, possessing cocaine, using cocaine, and assault, in violation of Articles 92, 112a, and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 912a, and 928, respectively. Appellant’s pleas of guilty to possession and use of cocaine were conditional pleas, entered in accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 910(a)(2). The adjudged sentence, imposed by a panel of officer and enlisted members, provides for a bad-conduct…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  2. United States v. Sergeant FRANCIS A. CARISTAArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  4. United States v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  5. Robinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API