Legal Opinion

City of Atlantic City v. Block C-11, Lot 11

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 9, 1977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pashman, J.

This is a companion case to Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10, et al., 74 N. J. 1 (1977) decided this day. Although the landowner in this case similarly challenges the constitutionality of notice requirements embodied in the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N. J. S. A. 54:5-104.29 et seq., she also questions the applicability of that statute to her property and asserts various procedural reasons in support of her motion to reopen a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of the plaintiff, City of At*37lantic City, under the Act. Both lower…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. New Brunswick Savings Bank v. MarkouskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Smith v. Cliffs on the Bay Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Schwartz v. DeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  5. Township of Brick v. Block 48-7New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API