Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Dey
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided November 14, 1989No. 71356PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. REINHARD, Special Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s judgment refusing to set aside a tax collector’s deed. We affirm.
The principal issue in this case is whether plaintiffs received constitutionally sufficient notice of a real estate tax sale. When this case was before us previously, Schwartz v. Dey, 665 S.W.2d 933 (Mo.banc 1984), we ruled that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing plaintiffs’ petition without considering evidence of the means available to the collector for apprising plaintiffs of the pendency of the sale. Upon remand, the trial court heard…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Covey v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Maximilian Investments, LLC v. Parcels of Land Encumbered With Delinquent Tax LiensMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Stadium West Properties, L.L.C. v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Collector of Revenue ex rel. Director of Collections v. Parcels of Land Encumbered with Delinquent Land Tax LiensSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- UNITED ASSET MANAGEMENT TRUST CO. v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent Land Taxes by Action in Rem ex rel. Director of Collections v. HoltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.