Legal Opinion
Brewster v. FC Russell Company
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1959No. 9765-r-FBPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBiegelmeier, J.
This appeal involves questions of the sufficiency of service of the summons and of the jurisdiction of the courts of South Dakota. Plaintiff’s verified complaint alleges that defendant is an Ohio corporation which is engaged in the manufacture, distribution and promotion of the Rusco products; that -it does business in South Dakota through authorized representatives; that plaintiff for several years worked as a Busco salesman and sold its products through H. S. Price Company; that defendant sponsored a contest for all salesmen engaged in the sale of its products; that plaintiff did…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State Automobile Casualty Underwriters v. RuotsalainenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Ventling v. KraftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Davis v. Interstate Motor Carriers AgencySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Biwabik, MN v. Bank of LemmonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.