Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Job Service North Dakota

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2008No. 20080071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDEWALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Janis Schmidt appealed from a judgment affirming Job Service North Dakota’s order denying her unemployment benefits after Job Service decided the Warwick Public School District terminated her employment for misconduct. We hold that a reasoning mind could reasonably find Schmidt deliberately disregarded her employer’s interests and violated standards the employer had a right to expect from her; that finding supports the conclusion Schmidt was not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits because she was discharged from her job for disqualifying misconduct.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Mississippi Employment Security Commission v. Philadelphia Municipal Separate School District of Neshoba CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Schadler v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Perske v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cornell v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schweitzer v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Gottus v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wisness v. Nodak Mutual Ins. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Schweitzer v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API