Legal Opinion

Butler v. King

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 1, 1954No. 4310PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The defendants had a duty to maintain reasonable conditions of safety and the plaintiff was entitled to place some reliance on the performance of that duty. Cartier v. Corporation, 92 N. H. 263; Holmes v. Stores, 95 N. H. 478; Monier v. Belzil, 97 N. H. 176. However the plaintiff is precluded from recovering damages if he received his injuries as a result of encountering a known danger to which he paid no heed. Paine v. Association, 91 N. H. 78, 79. In that case it was held that a basketball player, injured when he fell against bleachers close to the playing court, could not recover. In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rush v. HunzikerIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wolczak v. National Electric Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Buttrick v. Arthur Lessard & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  3. Hagenbuch v. Snap-On Tools Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Vittum v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. Estabrook v. American Hoist & Derrick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API