Butler v. King
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The defendants had a duty to maintain reasonable conditions of safety and the plaintiff was entitled to place some reliance on the performance of that duty. Cartier v. Corporation, 92 N. H. 263; Holmes v. Stores, 95 N. H. 478; Monier v. Belzil, 97 N. H. 176. However the plaintiff is precluded from recovering damages if he received his injuries as a result of encountering a known danger to which he paid no heed. Paine v. Association, 91 N. H. 78, 79. In that case it was held that a basketball player, injured when he fell against bleachers close to the playing court, could not recover. In…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rush v. HunzikerIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wolczak v. National Electric Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Buttrick v. Arthur Lessard & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Hagenbuch v. Snap-On Tools Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1972
- Vittum v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Estabrook v. American Hoist & Derrick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.