Legal Opinion

Westfall v. Rust International

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1991No. WCB 88-01147 CA A62442 SC S37923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

815 P.2d 1272 (1991)

312 Or. 34

In the matter of the Compensation of Randy R. WESTFALL, Claimant.

Randy R. Westfall, Petitioner On Review,

v.

RUST INTERNATIONAL and Underwriters Adjusting Company, Respondents On Review.

WCB 88-01147; CA A62442; SC S37923.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

On Petition for Review March 6, 1991.[*]

Decided August 22, 1991.

David C. Force of Vick & Gutzler, Salem, filed the petition, for petitioner on review.

Bradley R. Scheminske of Scheminske & Lyons, Portland, filed the response, for respondents on review.

David Gernant, Portland, filed a brief for amicus curiae Or. Trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Westfall v. Rust InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Westfall v. Rust InternationalOregon Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Lee v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API