Lee v. Maass
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.
On the merits of this case, we affirmed without opinion. 108 Or App 194, 813 P2d 1140 (1992). Petitioner’s court-appointed counsel then submitted a certification of compensation and expenses pursuant to ORS 138.500(4) and (5) and ORAP 13.15. We disallowed compensation for part of the time that counsel expended preparing petitioner’s brief and preparing for oral argument, because we determined that the argument advanced by counsel on petitioner’s behalf was frivolous.1 111, Or App 412, 826 P2d 97 (1992). Counsel has petitioned for review. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BalfourOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BalfourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Westfall v. Rust InternationalOregon Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ArabieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003