Legal Opinion

Westfall v. Rust International

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1991No. WCB 88-01147; CA A62442PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Claimant’s attorney petitions for review of our decision imposing sanctions on him pursuant to ORS 656. 390. 104 Or App 132, 798 P2d 1124 (1990). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it and adhere to our decision.

ORS 656.390 provides:

“Notwithstanding ORS 656.236, if either party appeals for review of the claim to the Court of Appeals or to the Supreme Court, or files a motion for reconsideration of the decision of the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, and the court finds that the appeal or motion for reconsideration was frivolous or was filed in bad faith or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Westfall v. Rust InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Westfall v. Rust InternationalOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Westfall v. Rust InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API