Legal Opinion
Kling v. Hallmark Cards Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 2000No. 99-55222PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
225 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2000)
MARY J. KLING, an individual, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant,
v.
HALLMARK CARDS INC., a Missouri corporation; MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees,
DIC ANIMATION CITY INC., f/k/a/ Live Film and Mediaworks, Inc., Defendant-cross-defendant-Appellee,
UNITED FEATURE SYNDICATE INC., Defendant-counter-claimant-cross-claimant-Appellee.
No. 99-55222
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Argued and Submitted June 9, 2000--Pasadena, California
Filed September 6, 2000
COUNSEL: Michael H. Bierman, Tuttle & Taylor, Los Angeles, California, for the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Media Rights Technologies, Inc v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Eat Right Foods Ltd. v. Whole Foods Mkt. Servs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Miller v. Glenn Miller Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Polar Bear Productions, Inc. v. Timex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.