Legal Opinion

United States v. Katherine Bordallo Aguon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1987No. 85-1318PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

Katherine B. Aguon was prosecuted for extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951; for conspiracy to commit extortion under 18 U.S.C. § 1951; for mail fraud; and for conspiracy to obstruct justice and for false statements in the grand jury investigation of her conduct. A jury acquitted her of mail fraud and convicted her of the other offenses. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Extortion: The Jury Instructions. Katherine B. Aguon, the defendant, was the Director of the Department of Education (DOE) of Guam between February 1980 and December 1982. A…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Lewis M. Dischner, United States of America v. Carl W. MathisenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Katherine Bordallo AguonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Reginald J. HolzerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Thomas J. Hard v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Jimmie L. WardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API