Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Meyer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1985No. 84-779PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

The Nebraska Appeal Tribunal ruled that the lump sum severance allowance received by the claimant, Larry A. Meyer, is to be prorated to the calendar quarters immediately following the date of payment in order to determine whether Meyer met the monetary eligibility requirements and thus qualified for weekly benefits under the Nebraska Employment Security *459Law. The Commissioner of Labor, Ronald E. Sorensen, appealed to the district court, which affirmed the ruling of the appeal tribunal. In this appeal the commissioner urges that the district court misapprehended the law. We agree with the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Garreans Ex Rel. Garreans v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Beatrice Manor, Inc. v. Department of HealthNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. PPG Industries Canada Ltd. v. KreuscherNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Giammattei v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Adkisson v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Nichols v. BusseNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. PolinskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. CarlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. StrattonNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Meyers v. MeyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API