Sain v. . Love
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
The ultimate question in the case is whether the words of the complaint, reasonably construed, classify the action within the principle of Douglass v. Dawson, 190 N. C., 458, 130 S. E., 195, or within the principle applied in Bane v. Powell, 192 N. C., 387, 135 S. E., 118.
One of the distinctions between those two cases was pointed out in Wall v. Howard, 194 N. C., 310, 139 S. E., 449. Stacy, C. J., writing in Corporation Commission v. Bank, 193 N. C., 113, 136 S. E., 362, declares: “That the right of action against the officers and directors of a banking corporation for loss or depreciation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Douglass v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Douglass v. . DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Corp. Commission v. Merchants BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Bane v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Wall v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jordan v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Wheeler v. American National Bank of BeaumontTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Wheeler v. American National Bank of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960