Legal Opinion

Lieferant v. Bartell

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William C. Hecht, Jr., J.

Stockholders of Macfadden Publications Inc. (“Macfadden”) sued to enjoin its merger with Bartell Broadcasting Corporation (“ Broadcasting ”). Special Term denied motions for injunctions pendente lite (Williams v. Bartell, 34 Misc 2d 552), and the merger was therefore consummated under Delaware law, the merged corporation taking the name Macfadden-Bartell. The Appellate Division, by a vote of three to two, granted the motions to the extent of restraining both of the predecessor corporations from using the assets or credits of “ Macfadden” in behalf of “Broadcasting” or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Porter v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Williams v. BartellNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brundage v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Levey v. BabbNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. E.F.S. Ventures Corp. v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API