Legal Opinion

Meier v. Anderson

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-3145PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAHN, District Judge.

In this case, the plaintiffs present a constitutional challenge to a provision of Pennsylvania’s Health Care Services Malpractice ’ Act (the Act), Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 40, §§ 1301.101 et seq. (Purdon Supp.1987). Specifically, the plaintiffs question the constitutionality of the provision establishing the Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund (the CAT Fund), Pa.Stat. Ann. tit. 40, §§ 1301.701(d), (e) and (f) (Purdon Supp.1988). The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment.

I. FACTS

The CAT Fund was established as an integral component of a…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Colorado Springs Production Credit Ass'n v. Farm Credit AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  3. Behar v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Pennsylvania Medical Providers Ass'n v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. United Wire, Metal & MacHine Health & Welfare Fund v. Morristown Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API