Legal Opinion

Eaton Corp. v. Parker-Hannifin Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 15, 2003No. CIV.A.00-751-SLRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On August 15, 2000, plaintiff Eaton Corporation filed this action against defendant Parker-Hannifin Corporation alleging willful infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,226,682 (“the ’682 patent”). (D.I.l) On January 22, 2001, defendant answered the complaint asserting non-infringement and invalidity of the ’682 patent. (D.I.7) On August 7, 2001, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint adding allegations of willful infringement of U.S. Patent Nos., 5,553,895 (“the ’895 patent”) and 5,570,910 (“the ’910 patent”). (D.I.16) On August 24,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Pennsylvania Coal Association, an Unincorporated Association v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States Department of Interior Robert Uram, Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, United States Department of Interior, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (Der), Intervenor in D.C. Pennsylvania Coal Association, an Unincorporated Association v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States Department of Interior Robert Uram, Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, United States Department of Interior Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources (Der), Intervenor in D.C. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Safety 1st, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API