Legal Opinion
Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Safety 1st, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 28, 2003No. Civ.A. 01-51PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SLEET, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On January 26, 2001, Fisher-Price, Inc. (“Fisher-Price”) filed suit against Safety 1st, Inc. (“Safety 1st”), Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc., and Dorel Design and Development, LLC (collectively “Safety 1st” or “the defendants”), alleging infringement of several patents. The patents-in-suit, United States Patent Nos. 5,660,435 (“the ’435 patent”), 5,947,552 (“the ’552 patent”), 6,257,659 (“the ’659 patent”), 6,247,755 (“the ’755 patent”), and 431,940 (“the ’940 patent”), relate generally to various carriers, strollers, and bassinets for…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Safety 1st, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004