Legal Opinion

Nash v. State Land Office Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. Docket 47, Calendar 45,101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

Plaintiff by his bill of complaint sought a decree of the chancery court requiring defendant to accept payments tendered by plaintiff on a land contract (which defendant had undertaken to forfeit) or to institute a summary ouster proceeding before a circuit court commissioner, and for other equitable relief. Defendant claimed that the for feiture of the land contract made and executed subject to the provisions of PA 1937, No 155, as amended, became complete and effective 30 days after the mailing to plaintiff and receipt by plaintiff, of a notice of forfeiture, and that it was not necessary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. GranetMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. DeYoung v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rothenberg v. FollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. In Re CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
  3. Emmons v. EasterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Gillam v. SamuelsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API